It is possible for hostile aircraft to strike the Northrop XP-79 flying wing while it is in the air

The Northrop XP-79 Flying Ram was a rocket- and jet-powered flying-wing fighter designed during the Second World War for the US Army Air Forces. The aircraft had some unique elements, among them its welded magnesium monocoque structure and the fact the pilot needed to man it from a prone position. What’s more, it was developed to ram enemy bombers in mid-air.

Photo Credit: U.S. Air Force / National Museum of the U.S. Air Force / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain
Northrop MX-334, precursor to the XP-79. (Photo Credit: Unknown / United States Army Air Forces Photographer / San Diego Air & Space Museum / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

The Northrop XP-79 was conceived by aircraft engineer Jack Northrop in 1942. After pitching his “high-speed rocket-powered flying-wing fighter” to the US Army Air Forces, a contract for two prototypes was given in January 1943, with the aim being to develop an aircraft capable of “ramming” enemy bombers from the sky.

Initially, the aircraft was to feature two Aerojet XCALR-2000A-1 liquid-fueled rocket engines, each producing 2,000 pounds of thrust. These ultimately proved unsatisfactory and the decision was made to, instead, install two Westinghouse 19B turbojets.

Northrop MX-334 in the wind tunnel at the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia. (Photo Credit: NASA Langley / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

The US Army Air Forces contracted Northrop for three gliders to test the design. These were dubbed the MX-324 when referring to the secret aspects of its powerplant and the MX-334 when it was operated as a true glider. The first, MX-334 No. 1, was tested in the wind tunnel at the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) Langley Research Center, and the results led to a vertical stabilizer being added for stability at high speeds.

The No. 2 glider participated in the first flight attempts; it was towed by a Cadillac car for takeoffs, landings and low-level flights. While these proved unsuccessful, subsequent tows with a truck and, later, a Lockheed P-38 Lightning proved more successful.

In early 1944, the No. 2 glider was modified with the Aerojet XCAL-200 rocket. The first flight took place on July 5, with the MX-324 becoming the first American-made, rocket-powered aircraft to fly. After flight testing was finished, the other two gliders were discarded.

Northrop XP-79B. (Photo Credit: USAAF / National Museum of the U.S. Air Force / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

The Northrop XP-79 had an overall length of 13.98 feet, a wingspan of 37.99 feet and a height of 7.58 feet. Its overall design resembled a flying wing, similar to the YB-49, and it featured a welded magnesium monocoque structure, as opposed to the typical riveted aluminum. At the “nose” was a central cockpit, which the pilot operated in a prone position, helping them to withstand more g-forces than they could in a seated position.

There were two air intakes on either side for the two engines. With its two Westinghouse 19B axial-flow turbojets producing 1,150 pounds of thrust each, the XP-79 could hit a maximum speed of 547 MPH and maintain a cruising speed of 480 MPH. It also had a range of 993 miles and a fuel capacity of 300 gallons, allowing for an endurance of almost two and a half hours.

As aforementioned, the XP-79 was developed to “ram” into enemy bombers. To do this without injuring the pilot or damaging the aircraft mid-flight, armored glass mounting was used in the cockpit and armor plating was added to reinforce the wings. When it became clear such a concept wouldn’t succeed, the aircraft was equipped with four Browning M2 machine guns.

Northrop XP-79B. (Photo Credit: USAAF / National Museum of the U.S. Air Force / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

The Northrop XP-79B made its first-ever proper flight on September 12, 1945. Concerns over the aircraft’s tires and brakes during taxiing trials at the Muroc Dry Lake (today Rogers Dry Lake) had previously delayed this.

Only 15 minutes into the flight, test pilot Harry Crosby lost control while performing a slow roll. The Xp-79B then began to spiral downward from an altitude of 10,000 feet, flying into the ground. Crosby attempted to bail out, but was hit by part of the aircraft and killed.

Following the crash, the XP-79 was canceled and all work stopped on constructing a second prototype.

Related Posts

Uncover the Terex RH170 Shovel Loader’s full potential: The ease with which the Hitachi wheel loader can move 250 tons of material surprises a lot of people

The Terex RH170 Shovel Excavator is a powerful and massive machine, known for its impressive loading capabilities. With its advanced hydraulic system and robust design, it is…

B-58 Hustler: The Ultimate Supersonic Bomber—Pushing the Boundaries

In the dynamic realm of aviation history, one aircraft stands out as a true pioneer of its time – the Convair B-58 Hustler. Tasked with flying at…

Presenting the most potent diesel engine in the world: a wonder with 107,389 horsepower

Few engineering achievements are as іmргeѕѕіⱱe as the development of the most powerful diesel engine ever made. This technical giant, possessing an іnсгedіЬɩe 107,389 horsepower, is the pinnacle…

Germany may ship armored vehicles to Ukraine from Wiesel

In late April, the Bundestag approved the expansion of the military-technical assistance program to Ukraine, signaling a significant development in their cooperation. This expanded assistance will now…

When the baby’s incredibly cute moments are captured on camera, everyone becomes enthralled

аmі𝚍 t𝚑𝚎 c𝚘nst𝚊ntl𝚢 𝚎ʋ𝚘lʋin𝚐 l𝚊n𝚍sc𝚊𝚙𝚎 𝚘𝚏 t𝚎c𝚑n𝚘l𝚘𝚐𝚢, 𝚘n𝚎 in𝚏𝚊nt 𝚑𝚊s s𝚞cc𝚎𝚎𝚍𝚎𝚍 in c𝚊𝚙tiʋ𝚊tin𝚐 𝚊 𝚐l𝚘𝚋𝚊l 𝚊𝚞𝚍i𝚎nc𝚎, winnin𝚐 𝚘ʋ𝚎𝚛 t𝚑𝚎i𝚛 𝚊𝚏𝚏𝚎cti𝚘ns 𝚊n𝚍 𝚏𝚊scin𝚊ti𝚘ns. T𝚑is 𝚛𝚎m𝚊𝚛k𝚊𝚋l𝚎 littl𝚎 іn𝚍іⱱі𝚍ᴜаɩ 𝚋𝚎𝚊𝚛s…

Promoting Adaptability: A Nineteen-Month-Old Infant thriving in Her Brother’s Clothes

Xaylen weighs over 2 stone (28 pounds), which has raised concerns about his rapid growth since birth. At just six months old, he was already fitting into…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *